Appropriate Women's Attire in Church Worship: Navigating Between Religious Obedience and Social Conformity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64099/qtyehn44Keywords:
Church, Dress Expectations, Modesty Standards, Social Acceptance, Women's ParticipationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of women’s perceptions regarding appropriate attire for worship in church and how this affects their participation in religious activities. A quantitative approach was used with a survey method, gathering data through questionnaires distributed to women in the Sinear Batangbabasal Congregation. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis to identify perception patterns and their relationship with participation levels. The results show that perceptions of appropriate attire—characterized by simplicity, modesty, and formality—are positively correlated with women’s participation in worship. Women who feel that their attire meets the church’s standards are more motivated to engage in church activities. However, the findings also indicate the presence of social pressure related to dress expectations, which may lead to anxiety, social inequality, and fragmentation within the church community. In conclusion, while dress standards can strengthen unity in the church, attention must be given to the social and economic diversity of the congregation to foster inclusive acceptance. This study suggests that the church should balance dress norms with respect for the social and economic conditions of individuals.
Downloads
References
Akhmetbekova, A. K. (2024). Discourse of national clothes in Kazakh and Turkish proverbs. Journal of Oriental Studies, 108(1). https://doi.org/10.26577/JOS.2024.v108.i1.03
Andrighetto, G., Grieco, D., & Tummolini, L. (2015). Perceived legitimacy of normative expectations motivates compliance with social norms when nobody is watching. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01413
Aov Thaddeus, K. (2024). Decoding the Shift: An Inquiry into the Evolution of Dressing Patterns among Female Christians: A Study of the Universal Reformed Christian (NKST) Church (1911-2022). African Journal of Culture, History, Religion and Traditions, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJCHRT-TJ1WINID
Arshad, Z., Aris, A., Md. Nor, Z., & Kamis, A. (2024). Women’s Islamic Shariah Compliant Dress: An Overview. Advances in Humanities and Contemporary Studies, 5(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.30880/ahcs.2024.05.02.002
Bogdan, P. C., Dolcos, F., Moore, M., Kuznietsov, I., Culpepper, S. A., & Dolcos, S. (2023). Social Expectations are Primarily Rooted in Reciprocity: An Investigation of Fairness, Cooperation, and Trustworthiness. Cognitive Science, 47(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13326
Carapina, I. (2015). Women are More Religious Than Men; is this True? Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15406/jpcpy.2015.02.00056
Chang, L. J., & Koban, L. (2013). Modeling emotion and learning of norms in social interactions. In Journal of Neuroscience (Vol. 33, Issue 18). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0973-13.2013
Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago Press.
Ego, A. J. (2023). Business Clothing For Females: Suitability For Effective Workplace Job Performance in Nigeria. Journal of International Education and Practice, 6(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v6i2.5533
Entwistle, J. (2023). The fashioned body: Fashion, dress and modern social theory. John Wiley & Sons.
Gatterson, B. A. K. (2016). Church dress: Oral narratives of African American women [Iowa State University, Digital Repository]. https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-5543
Goffman, E. (2023). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 450–459). Routledge.
Hang, Y., Soto, C., Lee, B., Speyer, L. G., Murray, A. L., & Mõttus, R. (2023). Social expectations and abilities to meet them as possible mechanisms of youth personality development. Journal of Personality, 91(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12760
Jarvis, A. (2007). The dress must be white and perfectly plain and simple: Confirmation and first communion dress, 1850-2000. Costume, 41. https://doi.org/10.1179/174963007X182354
Kamyab, F., & Hoseinzadeh, A. (2023). The Psychological Impact of Social Expectations on Women’s Personal Choices. The Psychology of Woman Journal, 4(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.pwj.4.2.20
Khmil, V. V., & Popovych, I. S. (2019). PHILOSOPHICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS OF PERSONALITY. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 16. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.187540
Kraus, M. W., & Mendes, W. B. (2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioural and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2330–2340. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000023
Mathew, M. M., & Thomas, K. A. (2018). Development and Validation of Perceived Social Expectations Scale Towards Medical Profession (PSESMP). Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(8), 25–34. https://www.jetir.org/view?paper=JETIRD006006
McNeill, L. S. (2018). Fashion and women’s self-concept: a typology for self-fashioning using clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2016-0077
Neal, L. S. (2019). Religion in Vogue: Christianity and fashion in America. NYU Press.
Nearman, S. (2013). Girls’ modesty garments. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140101826A1/en
Oguy, O., & Ivasiuk, O. (2019). Christian Symbolism of Color in the Middle Ages in the Context of a New Concept of the Symbol as a Hypermark. Mediaforum : Analytics, Forecasts, Information Management, 7, 188–210. https://doi.org/10.31861/mediaforum.2019.7.188-210
Phillips, A. B. (2012). Modern Modesty: The Renegotiation of Female Pious Dress In Modern Pentecostal Assemblies. University of Arkansas.
Rababa’h, M. (2024). Indications of Clothing from the Perspective of Islamic Culture. Arts and Social Sciences Series, 3(3), 399–430. https://doi.org/10.59759/art.v3i3.680
Sadawi, N. (2002). Perempuan, Agama dan Moralitas. Erlangga.
Salma, G., & Falah, A. M. (2023). Fashion sebagai Bentuk Ekspresi Diri dan Karakter Mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung. ATRAT: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 11(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.26742/atrat.v11i1.3197
Talal, H. A. (2025). Fabrics, Garments, And Complementary Elements Of Clothes (Accessories) In The Yakînî Divan. Journal of the College of Languages, 0(51), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2025.0.51.0237
Tariq, T. (2013). Let modesty be her raiment: The classical context of ancient-Christian veiling. In Implicit Religion (Vol. 16, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v16i4.493
Trzebiatowska, M., & Bruce, S. (2012). Why are women more religious than men? Oxford University Press.
Turner, B. S. (2008). The body and society: Explorations in social theory.
Turner, V., Abrahams, R., & Harris, A. (2017). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge.
Vannini, P. (2016). Body/embodiment: Symbolic interaction and the sociology of the body. Routledge.
Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butfer, E. M., Belavich, T. G., Hipp, K., Scott, A. B., & Kadar, J. L. (2015). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Sociology of Religion, 29–34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yulice Pitemo, Alce Mariani Labito, Lefran Lembolangi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This means that you are free to:
- Share – Copy, distribute, and transmit the material in this journal.
- Adapt – Remix, transform, and build upon the material in this journal for any purpose, including commercial purposes.
However, there are a few conditions you must follow:
- Attribution – You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You must do this in a manner that is reasonable but not in any way that suggests the author(s) endorse you or your use.
- ShareAlike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license, CC BY-SA 4.0.
This license applies internationally and gives users the right to distribute, modify, and create derivative works from the licensed material, as long as the derivative works are licensed under the same terms and appropriate credit is given to the original authors.
For the full terms and conditions, you can visit this link.
