Subdue and Have Dominion Over the Earth: Exploitation or Stewardship? An Interpretation of Genesis 1:28 from the Perspective of Hebrew Letter Symbolism

Authors

  • Yosua Anugrah Adi Setya Putra Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Tawangmangu Author
  • Firman Panjaitan Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Tawangmangu Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64099/3chmpe80

Keywords:

Anthropocentrism, Ecological crisis, Genesis 1:28, Kavasy dan Rada

Abstract

The global ecological crisis is becoming increasingly alarming due to the excessive exploitation of natural resources, as evidenced by deforestation, water scarcity, and the degradation of coastal areas. The impacts not only damage biodiversity and disrupt ecosystem balance, but also affect the socio-economic conditions of communities and exacerbate intergenerational inequality. Furthermore, the growing anthropocentric paradigm, both in economic practices and theological understanding, has contributed to driving unsustainable exploitation. This study aims to explore the role of humans as priests of nature as a solution to the ecological crisis by reexamining the theological understanding of Genesis 1:28, particularly the terms kavasy and rada. The research employs a qualitative approach through literature analysis and ecotheological study, focusing on the contextual and symbolic interpretation of biblical texts. The findings indicate that misinterpretations of Genesis 1:28 have perpetuated an anthropocentric paradigm that legitimizes the exploitation of nature. A reinterpretation through an ecotheological approach reveals that humans are called to act as priests who are responsible for caring for and preserving creation, rather than exploiting it. In conclusion, a theological reinterpretation of Genesis 1:28 through an ecotheological perspective can serve as an ethical and spiritual foundation for promoting sustainable natural resource management and mitigating the ecological crisis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benner, J. A. (2005). The ancient Hebrew lexicon of the Bible : Hebrew letters, words and roots defined within their ancient cultural context.

Cahyono, D. B. (2021). Eko-Teologi John Calvin: Dasar Kekristenan Dalam Tindakan Ekologi (Sebuah Respon Kekristenan Terhadap Tindakan Ekologi). Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi, 6(2), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.46933/dgs.vol6i272-88

Campanini, S. (2025). Gershom Scholem and Christian Kabbalah. Zutot, 22(1), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750214-tat00002

Carolina Sparavigna, A. (2014). The Creation of the World in the Sefer Yetzirah. International Journal of Sciences, 0(05), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.498

G. K. Baele. (2004). The Temple And The Church’s Mission (pp. 59–64).

Hall, D. J. (2007). Imaging God: Dominion as Stewardship. In Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary. Wiley.

Jamika, F. I., Monica, F., Razak, A., & Kamal, E. (2023). Pengelolaan Pesisir Dan Kelautan Dalam Studi Kasus Dampak Reklamasi Pantai Dan Tambang Pasir Terhadap Ekosistem Laut Dan Masyarakat Pesisir. JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN TROPICAL FISHERIES (JOINT-FISH) : Jurnal Akuakultur, Teknologi Dan Manajemen Perikanan Tangkap Dan Ilmu Kelautan, 6(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.33096/joint-fish.v6i1.162

Keller, C. (2020). Pneumatic foam: spirit vibrating ruach elohim merahephet. In The Face of the Deep (pp. 240–249). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451731-25

Lempp, W. (1987). Tafsiran Alkitab Kejadian 1:1-4:26. BPK Gunung Mulia.

Mathu, L. K. (2025). Creation Care in Genesis 1-2: A Theological Framework for Sustainable Development. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 1(1), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.1.1.2025.343

Muthmainnah, L., Mustansyir, R., & Tjahyadi, S. (2020). KAPITALISME, KRISIS EKOLOGI, DAN KEADILAN INTER-GENERASI : Analisis Kritis atas Problem Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia. Mozaik Humaniora, 20(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v20i1.15754

Panjaitan, F. (2020). Kesatuan Hubungan Allah-Alam-Manusia. Upaya Berteologi Kontekstual tentang Keutuhan Ciptaan Berdasarkan Konsep Penciptaan dalam Kejadian 1:26-31 terhadap Konsep Sangkang Paraning Dumadi dalam Budaya Jawa. Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Theologia Jaffray,Makassar.

Panjaitan, F. (2022). Teo-Ekologi Kontekstual dalam Titik Temu antara Kejadian 1:26-31 dengan Konsep Sangkan Paraning Dumadi dalam Budaya Jawa. GEMA TEOLOGIKA, 7(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2022.72.931

Rivera, L. J. (2025). Kabbala Denudata and Christian Knorr von Rosenroth’s Approach to the Zohar. Zutot, 22(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750214-02101008

Santoso, R., Ratnawati, H., & Riyanti, D. (2022). Indonesian Journal of Conservation i j Klusterisasi Tingkat Deforestasi: Ekologi Kewarganegaraan Indonesia,. Indonesian Journal of Conversation, 11(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijc.v11i1.35941.

Singgih, E. G. (2011). Dari Eden ke Babel (1st ed.). Kanisius.

Singgih, E. G. (2020). Agama dan Kerusakan Ekologi: Mempertimbangkan ‘Tesis White’ dalam Konteks Indonesia. GEMA TEOLOGIKA: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual Dan Filsafat Keilahian, 5(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2020.52.614

UN Climate Change. (2022). What is the Triple Planetary Crisis? In Https://Unfccc.Int/News/What-Is-the-Triple-Planetary-Crisis.

Weil, M. (2024). “Jewish Meditation Reconsidered”: Hitbodedut as a Meditative Practice and Its Transmission from the Egyptian Pietists to the Hasidic Masters. Religions, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101232

Wewo, C. L., Samin, M., & Hasan, M. H. (2023). Dampak Eksploitasi Air Tanah Secara Berlebihan Terhadap Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Air Penduduk Di Desa Raenyale, Kecamatan Sabu Barat Kabupaten Sabu Raijua. Jurnal Geografi, 19(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.35508/jgeo.v19i2.13886

White Jr., L. (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.

Published

29-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Subdue and Have Dominion Over the Earth: Exploitation or Stewardship? An Interpretation of Genesis 1:28 from the Perspective of Hebrew Letter Symbolism. (2026). MARSAHALA: Journal of Religious and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.64099/3chmpe80